HOME

AGENDA

LIST PREVIOUS MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL

Every effort is made to ensure the most current minutes and agenda are available. However, this site is not an official means of public notification.
Click here for more information.



Enter a keyword to search previous minutes

SALINAS CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

MAY 15, 2007 MEETING MINUTES

 

Mayor Donohue convened the joint City Council and Redevelopment Agency meeting at 5:00 p.m.

 

Present:

Mayor/Chairperson Dennis Donohue

Council/Agency member Janet Barnes

Council/Agency member Tony Barrera

Council/Agency member Gloria De La Rosa

Council/Agency member Jyl Lutes

Council/Agency member Sergio Sanchez

Council/Agency member Steve Villegas

 

Also Present:

City Manager/Executive Director Dave Mora

City Attorney/Agency Counsel Vanessa Vallarta

City Clerk/Secretary Ann Camel

 

JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SALINAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING

 

CITY OF CHAMPIONS

Councilmember Barrera and the Mayor and City Councilmembers recognized Sally Gutierrez for serving twenty years on the Library Commission.

 

PROCLAMATION

Mayor Donohue proclaimed May 20th through May 26th as Public Works Week.

 

PUBLIC COMMENTS

Jose Torres, Everett Alvarez High School Sophomore, thanked Mayor Donohue for helping him pay his tuition to attend the National Youth Leadership Forum.  He hopes to study medicine at Georgetown University. 

 

Ms. Torres thanked Councilmember Sanchez for his leadership mentoring that has assisted in her scholastic achievements.

 

Joe Vierra spoke in support of Measure A, the Monterey County General Plan Initiative.

 

Hans Jongens spoke in support of Measure A and B and against Measures C and D. 

 

CONSENT RESOLUTION

Upon motion by Councilmember Lutes and second by Councilmember Barnes, Council voted unanimously to adopt the Consent Resolution.

 

SALINAS CITY COUNCIL

 

1.     Approved minutes of May 8, 2007 meeting.

 

2.     Accepted financial claims report.

 

3.     Accepted monthly Financial Report for the month of April 2007.

 

4.     Adopted RESOLUTION 19202 authorizing the Mayor to sign agreements with the Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau for professional services.

 

5.     Adopted RESOLUTION 19203 authorizing an agreement with Humber Design Group, Inc. for East Bernal Drive improvements in the amount of $65,725.

 

6.     Adopted RESOLUTIONS 19204 AND 19205 authorizing the Mayor to sign a letter in support of S.144, Mynisha’s Law, and S.456, Gang Abatement and Prevention Act of 2007.

 

7.     Adopt RESOLUTION 19206 authorizing Mayor to sign letter requesting Congressman Farr to cosponsor the energy and environmental block grant proposal being introduced by Congressman Albert Wynn.

 

8.     Adopted RESOLUTION 19207 increasing limits for Housing Rehabilitation Loans and Grants.

 

SALINAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

 

1.   Approved minutes of May 8, 2007 meeting.

 

2.     Accepted financial claims report.

 

The Redevelopment Agency will adjourn. 

 

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

 

1.     Status Report on After School Programs

The following presenters provided reports on the expenditures of Measure V funding for their after school programs.  Tom Bonynge, Santa Rita Union School District; Katie Venza and Mary Pritchardfor Salinas City Elementary School District; John Favero, Salinas Union High School District; and Ruben Pulido, Alisal Union School District Superintendent.

 

Councilmembers spoke in support of the continued collaboration. 

 

PUBLIC HEARING

 

1.     Second Amendment to FY2006-07 ACTION PLAN to provide additional $17,000 (CDBG) for necessary building code upgrades to the Green Gold Inn, 30 Soledad Street.

Dave Swanson, Planning Manager, presented the report.

 

Mayor Donohue opened the public hearing.

 

Ms. Ferreira, Franciscan Workers, spoke in support of the allocation.

 

In response to Al Espindola, Deputy City Manager Russell stated that the crosswalk improvements would be funded and implemented in conjunction with other improvements.

 

COUNCIL ACTION

Upon motion by Councilmember Barnes and second by Councilmember De La Rosa, Council voted unanimously to adopt RESOLUTION 19208 effecting the second amendment to the Fiscal Year 2006-07 Action Plan and directing staff to notify HUD.

 

The City Council recessed to closed session at 7 p.m. pursuant to:

a.      Government Code Section 54957.6 with its designated labor representatives Dave Mora, City Manager; Vanessa Vallarta, City Attorney; Jorge Rifa, Deputy City Manager; Finance Director Tom Kever; and Teri Silva, Human Resources Manager regarding labor relations with Association of Management Personnel, Firefighters Association, Fire Supervisors Association, Confidential Employees, Confidential Management Employees, and Department Directors.

b.       Government Code Section 54957.6 with its designated labor representatives Dave Mora, City Manager; Vanessa Vallarta, City Attorney; Jorge Rifa, Deputy City Manager; Finance Director Tom Kever; and Teri Silva, Human Resources Manager regarding labor relations with Service Employees International Union (SEIU), SEIU Supervisors, and Salinas Municipal Employees Association/SEIU.  CANCELLED

 

The City Council reconvened in regular session at 7:35 p.m.

 

PUBLIC HEARING

 

1.     Appeal of Revocation of Card Room Permit for Cap’s Saloon.

Councilmember Sanchez announced that he has a potential conflict of interest and he left the meeting during consideration of this item.

 

Mayor Donohue announced that each party would have a total of thirty minutes for oral argument that may be used in argument or rebuttal or both.    

 

City Attorney Vanessa Vallarta announced that she has had some limited involvement in the prosecutorial capacity.  Mike Rodriquez of the law firm of Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver, and Wilson has been retained as legal advisor on this cast to ensure the integrity of the process.  Mr. Rodriquez replaced Ms. Vallarta on the dais.

 

Councilmember Sanchez announced that he has a potential conflict of interest and would abstain on this item.  Councilmember Sanchez left the meeting during the discussion at this time.

 

Mr. Rodriquez requested speakers to state their names for the benefit of the court reporter. 

Robert Pia, representing the appellant, announced that he had asked that Councilmember De La Rosa recuse herself.  Since then he has discussed this with his client, who believes that Councilmember De La Rosa would be able to consider the issue fairly and has asked that Mr. Pia withdraw the request for recusal.

 

Police Commander Perrien provided an overview of the card room permit process.  Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel destroyed evidence of a homicide that occurred at the card room.  During a State Gaming inspection in October 2001, Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel advised them that there had been no fights or problems and he did not tell them that he had destroyed evidence.  There was no control of the cash in the office area.  Exhibit Y states cash must equal to chips being used in the game.  Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel advised officials that he would instruct employees accordingly.  Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel’s permit has been suspended previously for extending credit to players in excess of $31,000; participating in a game with improper identification of his financial interest.  The Alcohol Beverage Control  revocation was initiated in 2002 and finalized in June 2004.  He has not yet provided notice of removal of alcohol from the premises.  In June 2005, alcohol was found on the premises.  In September 2005, the cash chip accountability issues continued.  In October 2006, alcohol was found again in greater amounts than in 2005.  The cash and alcohol problems are ongoing and uncorrected.

 

In regard to Salinas City Code Section 6-43(a)(5) regarding financial stability, they are thinly capitalized and have a negative net worth.  In regard to his business experience, there are unknown quantities of cash, no tracking of chips, an audit is impossible, and it has been documented multiple times over five years.  In June 2006, State Gaming imposed financial conditions that Cap’s was given 60 days to meet, which have not been met over 100 days later.  He destroyed evidence in a homicide, lied to Gaming officials, his employee sold alcohol and his license was revoked.

His unmet promises include statements that he would meet the Exhibit Y requirements, which he did not meet, as well as his statements regarding the removal of alcohol. 

 

Commander Perrien stated that card rooms carry cash and attract organized crime, which is why they are heavily regulated and held to a higher standard.  They have sought compliance over five to six years requiring hundreds of law enforcement hours.  A logical progression brought them to this point today, and there is no reasonable alternative left other than revocation of the City gaming license.

 

Detective Gerry Davis stated that he conducted several interviews with Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel over the last several years.  He has asked if he would like the interview conducted in English or Spanish and he chose English.  He always listened, asked intelligent questions, provided appropriate responses and never indicated he did not understand what was going on.  His license was revoked on June 10, 2004.  He admits he had alcohol in his bar, and this is a violation of the City Code.  Detective Davis showed a picture of the bottles with dispensers and stored alcohol found in the cooler on June 7, 2005.  He ordered Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel to remove the alcohol from the premises, not just from behind the bar.  He advised that he understood and would remove them from the building. On October 17, 2006, there is a bottle of alcohol behind the bar and trash behind the bar.  Detective Davis showed a picture of alcohol, including open bottles, in a locked storage room.  Bottles on the ground were behind the bar during the previous inspection.  He stated that the security camera had been disabled.  Detective Davis referenced the findings of the financial inspections in 2005, and he was warned of his violations that he had been warned about by Gaming investigators also.  A front office inspection was conducted on October 17, 2006, and he had cash lying around without any knowledge of the amount.  He admitted he was not in compliance with State orders, but then later stated he did not know. 

 

Jessica Steinberg, Deputy City Attorney, stated that Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel could retain his status in the building but would need to operate a different type of business.  The landlord has a legal duty to mitigate her damages by finding another tenant, and the property is downtown in a prime area.  Mr. Gonzalez knew that his card room was in jeopardy on October 17, 2006 when he was told that he was in violation of the conditions and yet he extended his lease for three years.  The Police Chief made the decision to revoke the permit because of Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel’s inability to make good and careful decisions.  He claims that since the State has issued him the card room license, the City should because the State now approves how he runs the cardroom.  The State did renew the permit for three months, which was only granted after communicating with the City and pending the City’s revocation proceedings.  The State does not approve of the cardroom operations and will testify to that tonight.  The State placed the conditions on his most recent license as on the prior license, which is evidence that the State has not accepted his explanations.  He asked that the Council look at his efforts during the last few months.  There is no concrete evidence that he is complying with the law.  The only evidence is his January 31, 2007 letter to the State.  During the October 17, 2006 inspection, he was out of compliance with State and City law.  His efforts were made too late.  The Police Chief made the decision to revoke the license on December 8, 2006, and efforts after this date are irrelevant today.  He was given six years to come into compliance. 

 

Robert Pia, representing Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel, stated that he disagrees with the officers’ conclusion that Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel speaks excellent English, because he has had difficulties communicating with him and has required his wife to translate.  People agree to things when they do not understand and want to please the questioner.  He got an adviser when he was told to do so the last time.  The State was going to give him another chance because they believed he was doing his best.  Mr. Pia does not believe the State would continue a license if they believed there was a serious violation.  They had the power to revoke it.  Regarding the landlord’s duty to mitigate, there are several empty commercial buildings in Oldtown Salinas.  He does not know if it would be that easy to rent the property given the trend for shopping centers despite the City’s revitalization efforts.  He would just like an opportunity to prove to the City and the State that he can run the operations in compliance with the statutes.  He has an adviser to get his operation into compliance since the October 17th visit.   He has secured the chips at the table and the money in the cash office and it is locked.  He is keeping a record of the chips and the money. 

 

Mr. Pia stated that when Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel asked to renew his license in July 2004, he was asked to pay $25,000 to conduct an investigation and he paid the City in August 2004.  From August 2004 to December 8, 2006, there was no indication that they would revoke his license.  Referring to   Exhibit 6 in his submittal, Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel exercised his lease option on November 14, 2006, and the landlord signed on December 1, 2006.  On October 17, 2006, there was a joint inspection by  Stat Inspector Mike McPetersand Salinas Detective Davis.  Mr. McPeters stated that he intended to start revocation proceedings and Detective Davis asked him not to send notice until the City’s proceedings are initiatedHe should have told Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel of his intent on October 17, 2006, and he would not have exercised the option on November 14.  He is stuck with thirty months on the lease, and he is asking for equity.  At the end of that period, he will surrender the license.  If a more experienced operator could come in and purchase the license and qualify for the City’s requirement, he could recoup his losses that way.  

 

Art Sabiniano, Salinas resident, stated that poker is popular, exciting and appeals to a diversity of people.   It provides much needed entertainment.  He asked where people would go if Caps is closed.  He stated that the State Commissioner could not issue a license for an establishment that was not in operation on December 31, 1999.  If Caps is closed, there may not be another card room in the City.  He asked that respectable business people be allowed to take over.   The City could impose stricter guidelines and supervision and require a consultant to ensure that the operator complies with the State and City regulations.  He asked if there were only one bingo parlor and the owner admitted mistakes, would it be closed.

 

Mr. Pia stated that regarding the destruction of evidence, there was a gang land killing that resulted in a head wound and blood on the bar and floor.  The lady bartender asked that the blood be cleaned because it made her ill, and he and his janitor cleaned it up without intending to destroy evidence.  That is why it took so long for the case to resolve.  That is why it took the female administrative law judge nine months to decide.  He knew the cameras were operating, and he did not have any motive for cleaning up the evidence.

 

Mike McPeters, State Special Agent Supervisor with the Division of Gambling Control, stated that he concurs with the assessment and statements made by the Salinas Police Department and Ms. Steinberg.  He stated that it is common to issue a temporary gaming license in situations such as this where there is a hearing pending.  Otherwise, the State would have to deny the gaming license and would have to close the establishment without the local hearing.  It does not mean that they are in support of Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel’s operations.  It is more common than not that when documents are sent to applicants, the analyst who conducts the investigation states that they should contact the Division because they understand that instructions may be confusing.

 

Adolf Salino stated that Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel has difficulty with English.  He has never seen alcohol and has been offered a ride home when needed.  It is a social center instead of a card room. 

 

Gustavo Lopez stated that he has never observed drinking.  They do not want to go out of town, and eating establishments would lose business if the cardroom closes.

 

Julianne Martinez stated that she has not been disrespected at Caps, and she would like him to have a chance to meet standards.

 

Gabriel Caldron, Salinas business owner, stated that he was told that they do not serve beer when he asked the first time he went in.  He has never seen anything wrong there, and his English is poor.  The violence is in the community.

 

Gustavo Lizarraga stated that he owns a home down the street and likes to socialize at Caps.  He is a bail bonds man and would not associate with a criminal element.  The Police Chief should be worrying about things other than cardrooms.

 

Katherine Kobrinsky Evans, Oldtown Salinas Association (OSA) Board of Directors and business woman, stated that there is no place for Caps in the future that OSA is working toward.  The only two deadly crimes in Oldtown occurred in CAPS under Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel’s tenancy.   Neither Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel nor staff attempted to aid the stabbing victim and mopped the blood to cover the crime within the establishment.  In 2001, they served alcohol to a minor.  In 2003, the alcohol license was revoked.  In 2003, Mr. Sabiniano stated he was buying the establishment, would clean it up and lobbied for more games and players in spite of opposition from OSA. 

 

Daniel Torres, Salinas resident, stated that seventy-five percent of the time that he goes to Caps, he attends only for a few hours and he does not just play cards but socializes.  He has never seen anyone drink alcohol.  He believes the bottles came from elsewhere.  He applied to be a dealer and he submitted his fee.  The City has kept $33 and returned $90.

 

Anthony Lane stated that he owns a club on California Street and has brought in entertainment to Salinas.  They purchased the Fox Theatre and are refurbishing it for their first event, which features comedian George Lopez.  They want to assist in renovating the downtown.  They would like to purchase the license at Caps.  They believe that with their experience, they could bring new discipline and organization to the business.  He has had a good relationship with local police over a seventeen-year period.  The City should not lose this opportunity.  They are prepared to take over the license and he asked for continuation until they could converse further.

 

Edward Kane, Salinas resident, stated that Caps is a pleasant experience, entertaining and gives people something to do. 

 

Frank Saunders stated that he owns the building next to Caps Saloon.  He used to enjoy going in.  But with new ownership, Caps went downhill and it should have been closed.  Mr. Saunders closed Margartias bar because there were two murders.  The owner continues to rent to the cardroom because she lives in Fresno.  He offered to buy it from her and close it.  Over the last few months, it has improved its operation.  The people are not bad and there is a need for recreation.  He believes it would be a disservice for them not to have an outlet.  The violations have been ongoing and he recommends that the City revoke the owners’ license but not all future licenses.

 

Chris Ortiz stated that he has been going to Caps since October and he has never seen anything untoward going on.  Caps does not fit the model that OSA is seeking, but how the business is operated rather than the nature of the business should not be the focus.  It is a watering hole instead of a place for playing poker. 

 

Ms. Steinberg stated that Corporal Davis testified that Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel understood English.  It is Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel’s duty to accept the offer of an interpreter, which the City was obligated to make.  It is not the City’s obligation to ensure that he understands.  He has not accepted the offer for translation this evening and is listening to proceedings in English with his attorney at his side.  Regarding what the Council could do to ensure that cardrooms do not die.  There has been some misinformation.  There is no prohibition regarding a permit, but City Code Section 6-49 limits the total cardrooms to one at a time.  It does not say that the Chief is prohibited from reviewing a new application once this license is gone.  Another thing raised is that the cardroom can be transferred, sold, or assigned.  This license can no longer be transferred or assigned because there is no saleable license in the City of Salinas.  The license is only transferable under very specific circumstances, none of which are present here.  The person currently holding the permit has to be in good standing with the law,  the license hs to be in good standing and a cloud has been brought over this license with hearing, and the Council would have to approve the transfer.  Staff recommends that the license be revoked and other applicants submit a new application and the same rigorous review would apply.  Staff believes that this is the only option.  Caps has received investigations over six years, spaced out by one year or more, and investigators have repeatedly returned to see if they have improved and they have not.  Lastly, the audience states that this is a place for people to gather in a friendly environment.  They are not asking that they give us their lease, but are asking that he no longer be permitted to operate a card room. 

 

Mr. Pia stated that the Council is being asked to revoke the license and if you decide to continue the license and allow it to operate, there is no branding of it but it is not in good standing.  He believes this is a splitting of hairs that he does not believe the law allows the way the ordinance reads.    Article XIII of Section 19963(a) of the State Gambling Control Act states that in addition to limitations of gaming, the Commission may not issue a gambling license for an establishment that was not license to operate on December 31, 1999 unless an application was on file prior to September 1, 2000.  He would have to get a license that was in operation before December 31, 1999, which this license has.  That is why he asks for an opportunity to be rid of the burden of the lease.  He believes the license is held by Caps Incorporated, meaning it does not die with the individual but lives during the life of the corporation. 

 

Councilmember Lutes asked if the Council supports the appeal, i.e. reverses the revocation, is the license then in good standing in order to be sold or transferred and how would someone receive a new license.

 

Mr. McPeters stated that his understanding is that the section discussed deals with new cardrooms, expansion of gaming, in jurisdictions that did not have a cardroom in 1999.  Salinas is a jurisdiction that did have a cardroom in 1999.  A State gaming license cannot be transferred, so it is moot as to whether it is in good standing.  A new application would have to be submitted.  If the license were no longer in good standing, the establishment would have to be sold to a new owner, who would have to go throught the application process.  If the old owner were in bad standing, they would have to be removed.

 

Councilmember Barnes stated that Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel had every opportunity to comply.  She wonders why he did not use translation services tonight if he has difficulty understanding English.  She believes there is compelling evidence to show fiscal irresponsibility.  If the license is extended, the City would be turning a blind eye to the Police Department and would not be upholding the law. 

 

Councilmember Barrera stated that every businessman has a responsibility to know the rules and regulations.  The Department of Gaming and the Police Department have bent over backwards.  He has frequented the cardroom, and no one wants to close it down.  However, there have been numerous violations.  It is not personal.  When the owner has been asked to comply, he has stated he would do his best to comply only to do the same thing.  He hears that there is a good possibility that this would not be the end of card playing opportunities.  He believes that card playing could be a good business.  If there are violations regardless of the location, the City has an obligation to act.

 

Councilmember Villegas stated that he was invited to visit Caps on a Saturday night at 7 p.m..  He is unsure if anyone would be interested in renovating the building, because it would require hundreds of thousands of dollars.  He only saw one or two people come in and out.  They are being asked to extend the license to allow renovation.  Eight or nine people would generate insufficient revenue, and he is barely able to meet payroll and has zero liquidation assets.  Councilmember Villegas offered to converse with Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel in Spanish, but he elected English.  He believes downtown visitors would be uncomfortable walking by the people lingering in front of Caps. He believes the history of crime speaks for itself.

 

Councilmember Lutes stated that her hesitation regarding revoking the license is that the City would lose the only gaming license in town.  The Planet Gemini owner brought up good arguments.  She believes Art Sabiniano ran a model gaming operation.  She has no sympathy for Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel because he has been given every opportunity, although she feels sorry for the patrons.  She is happy to learn that someone could come in and open another facility.

 

Councilmember De La Rosa stated that it is unfortunate that Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel did not have the know how to run the business.  She is pleased that Salinas could have another card room.  Mr. Sabiniano ran a legitimate card room.  She sees youth playing cards because that is the in thing.  She would like to see someone come forward and open a legitimate room.

 

Mr. Pia stated that the language of the statute differs from Mr. McPeters’ statements.

 

Mr. Rodriquez cautioned Council that Mr. McPeters has testified that he is not an expert.  They can give his testimony weight but it may not be conclusive.  Whether there is some ability for a cardroom to continue has not been resolved.  But that is not the issue, but rather whether there is enough evidence to rescind or revoke the license. 

 

Councilmember Barnes asked whether the license could be rescinded contingent up whether there would be another card license within the City. 

 

Mr. Rodriquez stated that Mr. Pia and the City Attorney’s Office could provide additional briefings. 

 

Mayor Donohue noted the options are to affirm, modify, or reverse the revocation of the permit.  He stated that this is not personal.  He supports the Police Chief and the Department and he cannot make the leap from customers comments that no alcohol is being served to the pictures from the Police Department.  Mr. Gonzalez-Curiel must have known that he had a problem regardless of his English skills.  It concerns him that good people looking for a legitimate outlet.  He does not believe the Council wants to deprive people of their recreation.  He would support an application for a well-run, established gaming room.  He does not want to deprive the City of a gaming license. 

 

Councilmember Barnes stated that she believes that the issue is about Caps.  The permit cannot be transferred.  What is before the Council is whether the license should be revoked. 

 

MOTION

Councilmember Barnes moved to revoke Caps Card Room permit.  The motion died for lack of a second.

 

Mr. Mora stated that Council has indicated they would like the information and they could charge Mr. Rodriquez to provide an opinion. 

 

Mr. Rodriquez stated that he could provide the opinion by May 22, 2007.

 

COUNCIL ACTION

Upon motion by Councilmember Lutes and second by Councilmember De La Rosa, Council voted unanimously to continue this item to May 22, 2007.  Abstain:  Councilmember Sanchez.

 

CONSIDERATION

 

1.   Proposed Adjustment to BFI’s Schedule of Service Fees and Schedule of Approved Rates for Commercial and Residential Customers.

 

Councilmember Sanchez rejoined the meeting.

 

Denise Estrada, Maintenance Director, presented her report.  This would equate to a ten cents per month increase for the average residential customer.  BFI and the City would still have the lowest rates for residential residents in Monterey County.  The senior low-income rate would increase by twenty-five cents.

 

Gloria Moore expressed concern about applying the commercial rate to multi-family complexes and scavenging of recycle bins. 

 

Al Espindola expressed concern regarding recycling being taken from containers and he asked what BFI is doing to increase recycling. 

 

Councilmember Barnes note that recycling has increased from 12% to 55% since BFI has become the waste hauler.

 

Councilmember Sanchez suggested that apartment complexes should increase recycling and he would like to consider providing benefits for low-income residences. 

 

 

COUNCIL ACTION

Upon motion by Councilmember Sanchez and second by Councilmember De La Rosa, the City Council voted to adopt RESOLUTION 19209 approving the annual adjustments to BFI’s schedule of service fees and schedule of approved rates for commercial and residential customers.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

 

2.   Park Needs Assessment.

Denise Estrada, Maintenance Director, stated that Salinas has less than three acres per 1,000 residents compared to the average of 10 acres per 1,000 residents.  There are inadequate resources to take care of additional facilities.  Capital repairs and new construction including ADA accessible improvements are needed.  The budget has decreased to solely health and safety issues.  Based on acreage, Salinas should have 36 maintenance employees.  Staffing was reduced from 30 employees to 19 employees a few years ago, but has recently been restored to 27 employees with Measure V funding.  Staff would continue to apply for grant funds to fund additional park resources. 

 

Al Espindola stated that the parks are in need although the City has done as much as it could with what it has.  He suggested that a financial assessment may be in order.

 

Councilmember Lutes stated that enforcement of the helmet regulation is needed at the skateboard park.

 

Councilmember Sanchez stated that private/public partnerships are needed.  A group has offered to pay for lights at Constitution and no one has contacted them and the City should consider partnering with Monterey County.  The Council needs to begin committing funds to parks and a subcommittee should be considered.

 

COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/APPOINTMENTS/FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

By consensus, the Council decided to resume the 4 p.m. City Council meeting time effective June 5th

 

Councilmember Sanchez asked that Councilmember reports be moved to the beginning of the agenda.  He requested a joint Police Advisory Committee meeting to hear how they could become involved with the City Council.  He has been approached by Hartnell College offering two portable buildings if the City would pick them up and move them, and perhaps they could be moved to Closter Park. 

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

The meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m..

 

                                                                        APPROVED:

 

 

                                                                        ___________________________

                                                            MAYOR DENNIS DONOHUE

ATTEST:

 

______________________________

CITY CLERK ANN CAMEL


HOME

AGENDA

LIST PREVIOUS MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL